I do not watch beauty pageants. I believe that Christian women should not parade themselves in immodest clothing such as nightgowns and swimsuits. Today this even includes some of the regular day-to-day clothing that women fashion. The Bible makes it extremely clear that both men and women are to be modestly clothed (Gen. 3:21; 1 Timothy 2:9).

That being said, I wanted to give a few comments on what I read about concerning Miss California's recent comments after being asked about same sex "marriage." Her response was basically that she wasn't there to judge anyone else, but she was raised (and still believes) believing that marriage was between a man and a woman. It appears that her statement outraged the judge that asked her the question, and he has since written some terrible things about her. I am glad that she at least stood up for what she believes to be right.

However, a much bigger problem exists here, and this is that the belief that marriage is to be between men and women should not be presented as an opinion. It is not just her opinion or my opinion; it is the rock solid standard of the Almighty Creator. Scripture makes it clear from the very beginning. Yahweh created Adam and then made this man a helper comparable to himself - the helper was a woman, not another man. He commanded the two of them to be fruitful and multiply, something that can only be done in the man-woman marriage context. Yahweh even goes on in the Genesis account to say that there comes a time when a man must leave his father and mother. Notice again that the man is leaving his father (man) and mother (woman), and then cleaving to his wife. This shows the family unit begins with the marriage of a man and a woman.

What Christians need to do is quit worrying about how people will feel about their standards (which are God's standards) and quit worrying about being politically correct. If Yahweh's word teaches it we need not be ashamed about believing it and proclaiming it. We can always proclaim it in love, but love includes rebuke (Lev. 19:17). We are called to command sinners to repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand (Mt. 4:17). Repentance includes a turning away from sin and a turning to righteousness. If thieves, murderers, drunkards, revilers, adulterers, fornicators, and yes homosexuals want to inherit the kingdom, they must stop practicing their sin. This is the law of Yahweh.

Matthew Janzen

"Unto Adam also and to his wife did Yahweh Elohim make coats of skins, and clothed them." [Genesis 3:21]

The origin of clothing finds itself in the sin of the representatives of mankind. Adam and Eve were both and not ashamed prior to their fall (Genesis 2:25); soon thereafter their sin made them feel a need to cover their ness with loincloths or aprons (Genesis 3:7). This must not have been a sufficient covering in Yahweh's sight for Genesis 3:21 reports to us that Yahweh made both Adam and Eve "coats" of skin and clothed them.

The word "coats" in the King James Version and many other versions of the Bible is somewhat of an unfortunate translation. Yes the KJV translates the underlying Hebrew word for coat as "coat" some 23 of the 29 times it is found in Hebrew Scripture. Of the remaining times we have 5 translations of "garment" and 1 translation of "robe."

However, although the New American Standard Bible translates Genesis 3:21's use of the word as "garments" the majority of the time it uses the translation "tunic" (20 out of 29 times). Other translations in the NASB are "coat" (2x), "dress" (1x), and "garment" (6x).

A detailed study of this Hebrew word (ketoneth) easily reveals that the best translation is found in our English words "tunic" or "robe." For the most part it is not difficult to find a person who is unwilling to admit that in the days of Abraham, Moses, Nehemiah, and Yeshua the Messiah the basic garment for both men and women were robes. What is a little more difficult to persuade people on is that the reason Hebrew men and women dressed like this was based upon the appointing of such a garment by Yahweh in Genesis 3:21. In other words, garments like or similar to pants, shorts, mini-skirts, etc. were in existence then, but those Israelites following the plan of Yahweh given to Adam and Eve dressed in the prescribed garment of their federal ancestry.

Back in 2004 I began a study on women's apparel in the Bible. The more I studied the more I found out that I didn't know nearly as much as I initially thought I did. Genesis 3:21 became somewhat of a "fridge text" (you know the one in your kitchen) for the subject. One great point that comes to my mind as I write this now concerns the word "make" in Genesis 3:21. The KJV says that Yahweh "made" (or "...did Yahweh make") tunics for Adam and Even and clothed them. A first glance automatically takes our mind to the making of clothes by a seamstress, but surely Yahweh did not get out a heavenly needle and thread and commence to sew. A much better translation for the Hebrew word here (asah; see Psalm 104:19) would be appoint or appointed. Yahweh appointed this clothing for Adam and Eve. This is the type of clothing Yahweh wanted them to wear for modesty.

Tunics and robes in ancient Biblical times were basically this: a long shirt-like garment that had mid to long sleeves and reached anywhere from the knees to the ankles. The garment was loose and sufficiently draped over the mid-section of both man and woman. The pants worn by most in America today certainly do not fit this description. Pants accent the mid-section on both men and women rather than modestly clothe it. Sure, some pants are more loose than others, but nevertheless this is not the garment that Yahweh appointed in Genesis.

I'll pick up more on this in a later post but for now let me just say that people in general have lost their sense of modesty, both men and women. It is not a priority in the lives of humans today. People do not ask themselves the question "Is this modest enough?" when pouring through clothing at the department store. As a matter of fact it appears from noticing the populous in this country that people actually shop for clothing that they feel is immodest. This only lights the fire of sexual immorality. Men and women need to realize that their body is for their mate; whether they are married or single. I mention the single crowd because they need to save their self for their future husband or wife, not only in the issue of marital , but also in the issue of not allowing others to see what is only intended for their future spouse.

Matthew Janzen